Perception of peer review in the omscs program
نویسنده
چکیده
This study investigates the perception of OMSCS students on the topic of the current peer review process in the OMSCS program. This includes the discussion of the potential steps that could be taken to improve the peer review process. Peer feedback has been demonstrated to support students’ learning in traditional classroom models. But the same has not been established for online programs like the OMSCS. To address this gap, views of OMSCS students on the benefits and shortcomings of the current peer review process were examined. Results suggest that while some of the findings are similar to the ones noted in existing literature, some are unique to the OMSCS program. Again, there are several studies which provide recommendations to improve the reliability of peer reviews. This paper also discusses the relevance of these recommendations and their applicability to the OMSCS program. Recommendations such as small peer review groups, taking inputs from students for formulating peer review grading rubric, incentives to those students who provide meaningful and prompt feedback will help in improving the current peer review process in OMSCS. Keywords— peer review, validity, accuracy
منابع مشابه
Peer Assessment in evaluation of Medical sciences students
Introduction: Recently, peer assessment is especially noticed as a progress evaluation method. Although it is a known method, it is a novel method in many countries that they use traditional methods. Then the topic of current review article is peer assessment in medical education. Methods: The documents related to peer assessment, advantages, disadvantages, applications and how use it extracte...
متن کاملThe Viewpoints of Alborz University of Medical Sciences’ Faculty Members on Open Peer Review of Journal Articles
Background and Aim: The open peer review process, which is one of the peer-reviewed methods in journals, has been accepted in scientific forums. The aim of this study was to investigate the points of view of university faculty members about the open peer review process of journal articles. Materials and Methods: The study used a descriptive survey. The sample size was calculated using the Coch...
متن کاملA Review on the Editorial Peer Review
Background and Objectives: The editorial peer review has an important role in the publication of scientific articles. Peers or reviewers are those scholars who have the expertise regarding the topic of a given article. They critically appraise the articles without having any monetary incentives or conflicts of interest. The aim of this study was to determine the most important aspects of the ed...
متن کاملDesigning an Integrated Multilevel Evaluation Model: A Case Study of the School Peer Counseling Program
This study sought to design a comprehensive evaluation model which can be utilized to evaluate educational programs with broad target populations and multiple management and executive layers, including the School Peer Counseling Program. This qualitative research had a descriptive design. Purposeful sampling method was used and the sample was non-randomly selected from the executive scientific ...
متن کاملThe Effect of Peer Mentoring Program on Nursing Students’ Stressors in Clinical Environment
Introduction: Without clinical education, efficient nursing education is hardly achievable. Nursing Students recall clinical education as their most stressful course ever. Peer mentoring may be one of the strategies to reduce student stress in the clinical environment. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects that a peer mentoring program has on nursing students’ stress factors in cl...
متن کامل